<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Banter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchbanter.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchbanter.com</link>
	<description>A blog about search engine optimization, seo news, tips and all other such banter. By Nelson James</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Google Chat For your Website</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-chat-for-your-website</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-chat-for-your-website#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like Google has had this for a while, but this is my first time seeing it. A pretty cool live chat feature you can put on your site&#8230;and you can&#8217;t really beat the price. Believe me, I&#8217;ve looked.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-chat-for-your-website/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Friend Connect API</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-friend-connect-api</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-friend-connect-api#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m at PubCon south and Matt Cutt&#8217;s from Google just announced a Google Friend Connect API. They haven&#8217;t even released their own news story yet, so this is breaking news! Check it out on the SEO Blog!
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-friend-connect-api/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Friend Connect</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-friend-connect</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-friend-connect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[scrapbooking
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/google-friend-connect/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am super cool today</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/i-am-super-cool-today</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/i-am-super-cool-today#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is my super cool post.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/i-am-super-cool-today/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Search Overpowering Traditional Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/is-search-overpowering-traditional-media</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/is-search-overpowering-traditional-media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/seo/is-search-overpowering-traditional-media</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Google-Nielsen study showed that television commercials for movies were only 2 percent more influential in the decision to see a particular film than the medium of search. What ever happened to print? And what about radio? and only a 2 percent difference between television and search? The world is definitely changing.
Will search ever [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/is-search-overpowering-traditional-media/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO.com</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/seocom</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/seocom#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/seo/seocom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official. Our company has been acquired by WashingtonVC and we are now SEO.com! This is big news. Bigger than most people outside of our industry understand. Not only is SEO.com a three letter domain (which are next to impossible to come by), in my opinion, it makes the list of the top 10 best [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/seocom/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Site Explorer Showing Link Quality?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/yahoo-site-explorer-showing-link-quality</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/yahoo-site-explorer-showing-link-quality#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/seo/yahoo-site-explorer-showing-link-quality</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Roundtable recently wrote a post saying that it appears Yahoo! is ordering the links in their site explorer based on their perceived quality. They searched a few sites including their own and found this to be the case so I decided to try a few myself. I tried it on this site (SearchBanter) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/yahoo-site-explorer-showing-link-quality/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adsense Allows More Ads Per Page</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/adsense-allows-more-ads-per-page</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/adsense-allows-more-ads-per-page#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/seo/adsense-allows-more-ads-per-page</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Adsense is now allowing its users to put 3 link units on every page as opposed to the 1 link unit you could historically place. This technically means that you can have 3 blocks of Ads and 3 link units on every page.
The interesting thing about this change in policy is that it comes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/adsense-allows-more-ads-per-page/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why MSN Won&#8217;t Make It as a Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/why-msn-wont-make-it-as-a-search-engine</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/why-msn-wont-make-it-as-a-search-engine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/seo/why-msn-wont-make-it-as-a-search-engine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSN has been continually losing what little footing they had as a search engine. Every month their search engine market share percentage decreases by a percentage or two. You wouldn&#8217;t think that was much except that if the trend continues, they&#8217;ll have 0 market share before the end of the year. 
So as big as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/why-msn-wont-make-it-as-a-search-engine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reciprocal Linking</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbanter.com/reciprocal-linking</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchbanter.com/reciprocal-linking#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson James</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbanter.com/seo/reciprocal-linking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts recently wrote a post where he talked about reciprocal linking. The jest of the post was that reciprocal linking wasn&#8217;t bad depending on how you do it, but as time goes on, it&#8217;s definitely given less weight in the search engines. 
Should you do any reciprocal linking then? I would say this: Reciprocal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchbanter.com/reciprocal-linking/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
